Subscription review found $200 a month of overlap and overbuying
Posted by @collymonster on X, .
Caveats
- Business spending, not household. The money is business or developer spending, or rental property.
$200 a month
Lower recurring bill · as reported, with no screenshot
The poster's claim
About $200 a month.
The money
- Type
- Lower recurring bill
- Measured against
- Compared with the previous bill
- Per month
- $200 (as reported, with no screenshot)
- Per year
- $2,400 (as reported, with no screenshot)
- Rough first-year value in USD
- $2,400 (as reported, with no screenshot)
How this is counted: Monthly cut of $200 x 12 months, assuming the new price holds for a year.
What the post shows
Evidence: Text only The post states the result but shows nothing that backs it up.
Attached image is an unrelated news chart, so the claim is text only. Part of the savings are developer costs (API, Vercel).
Stage: Reported done As reported, the change is in effect or the money has landed. This says what was reported, not how well it is proven.
What they asked the bot
Prompt (adapted)
Review all my subscriptions.
Paraphrased from the post, not the exact words.
What the bot did
Found a ChatGPT plan already included in Revolut Premium, 5 TB of Google storage when 2 TB was enough, a $40 API with a $5 alternative, a misconfigured Vercel plan, and overlapping X and Grok plans.