Evidence: Provider confirmation shown Stage: Didn't work
One of the three rejection emails is shown.
People-search sites rejected the opt-outs because he lives in Florida
Posted by @MchlMSar on X, . Post re-checked with its images on 2026-10-19.
The poster's claim
All three rejected the requests, citing no comprehensive privacy law in Florida; he worries he handed them more data.
The money
- Type
- No amount stated
- Measured against
- No baseline (refund, claim or admin)
How this is counted: No amount stated; no value estimated.
What the post shows
Evidence: Provider confirmation shown The post shows the provider's own email, chat or confirmation page.
Screenshot of FastPeopleSearch's rejection email citing no comprehensive privacy law in his state (Florida). The other two rejections are text only.
Stage: Didn't work The attempt did not work.
What they asked the bot
Prompt (adapted)
Remove me using the promoted removal skill.
Paraphrased from the post, not the exact words.
What the bot did
Submitted opt-outs to FastPeopleSearch, TruePeopleSearch and USPhoneBook.